This guide compares the best AML software providers for 2026 across sanctions screening, PEP coverage, adverse media, ongoing monitoring, transaction monitoring, KYB integration, and pricing.
| # | Provider | G2 | Capterra | TrustRadius | Gartner | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | iDenfy | 4.9 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 4.88 |
| 2 | Sumsub | 4.5 | 4.7 | — | — | 4.60 |
| 3 | ComplyAdvantage | 4.4 | 4.0 | — | — | 4.20 |
| 4 | Onfido | 4.4 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 4.13 |
| 5 | Veriff | 4.3 | 4.0 | — | — | 4.15 |
Notable Mentions
| # | Provider | What They’re Known For |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | LexisNexis | Established in 1970, one of the key players in global regulations and compliance. Deep database-driven AML screening for financial institutions across 80+ countries. |
| 7 | Salv | Risk scoring and AML compliance software hub for financial institutions. Strong in collaborative AML intelligence and network-level fraud detection between banks. |
AML Software Feature Comparison (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of the top AML software providers across the capabilities that matter most for compliance teams.
| Feature | iDenfy | Sumsub | ComplyAdvantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanctions List Coverage | All lists, per-country filter | Global (frequency undisclosed) | Proprietary DB, every 15 min |
| Sanctions Update Frequency | Daily | Not disclosed | Every 15 minutes |
| PEP Screening (all 4 levels) | ✓ (incl. relatives/RCAs) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adverse Media | ✓ (proprietary context-aware algorithm) | ✓ (no info on algorithm) | ✓ (proprietary real-time DB) |
| Ongoing AML Monitoring | ✓ (dashboard + webhook) | ✓ (workflow builder) | ✓ (filter by PEP level/risk) |
| Transaction Monitoring | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ (dedicated TM product) |
| AML Case Management | ✓ (dashboard + audit trail) | ✓ | ✓ (deep TM case workflows) |
| KYB / Business AML Checks | ✓ | Contact Sumsub | ✓ |
| Integration with KYC | ✓ (native, auto-triggered post-IDV) | ✓ (workflow rules) | API integration required |
| Webhook / API Alerts | ✓ | ✓ | Not clearly stated |
| Bulk Screening | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Scoring | ✓ (built-in, weighted) | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 + SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cyber / E&O Insurance | ✓ (Lloyd’s of London) | No public info | No public info |
| Pricing Model | Pay per approved (KYC-integrated) | Pay per completed ($1.35/check) | Custom quote |
| Feature | Onfido | Veriff |
|---|---|---|
| Sanctions List Coverage | Real-time via API | Supported |
| Sanctions Update Frequency | Real-time | Not disclosed |
| PEP Screening (all 4 levels) | ✓ (24h recency) | ✓ |
| Adverse Media | No public info | ✓ |
| Ongoing AML Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Transaction Monitoring | ✗ | ✗ |
| AML Case Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| KYB / Business AML Checks | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration with KYC | ✓ (via custom flows) | ✓ |
| Webhook / API Alerts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bulk Screening | Contact Onfido | Contact Veriff |
| Risk Scoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 + SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cyber / E&O Insurance | No public info | No public info |
| Pricing Model | Pay per each | Pay per completed ($1.39/check) |
See why 1,000+ companies chose iDenfy
Compare features, pricing, and support — then try iDenfy free with no commitment.
Book a Free DemoCriteria for Comparing AML Service Providers
When we compare the best AML software vendors, we take into account a few major aspects: compliance with up-to-date regulatory requirements and the correct software approach. Suppose an AML service does not provide up-to-date sanctions or PEP information whenever new subjects are included in the sanctions list. In that case, a company using such a service has a higher chance of receiving a penalty during auditing, especially if the company is subject to mandatory AML compliance.
Related: AML Regulations in the USA: Everything You Should Know as a Business Owner
Additionally, if the service does not provide the correct API or dashboard integration, then the company has to spend additional development resources to have the following functionality:
- On-demand AML or adverse media checks for one or bulk users.
- Ongoing periodic checks for included subjects.
- Full history of AML hit changes.
In this coverage, we aim to verify whether software vendors actually cater to businesses’ needs and offer the necessary services. The most common ones are Enhanced due diligence (EDD), Customer due diligence (CDD), and countering common AML fraud occurrences.
We’ve chosen the following criteria and compared how each of the AML software providers implements the following functionality:
- Sanctions & PEPs check
- AML ongoing monitoring
- Adverse media screening
- Integration with identity verification
- Company sanctions check and Know Your Business integration
#1 iDenfy

4.88 Average Score · (4.8 Capterra | 4.9 G2 | 5.0 TrustRadius | 4.8 Gartner)
With the iDenfy ID verification system, convert more users, scale faster, and tackle security challenges with the powerful, all-in-one identity verification, business verification, fraud prevention, and compliance platform.
Sanctions & PEPs check. iDenfy integrates with major sanctions lists and all 4 levels of PEP status, including relatives and close associates (RCAs). The update frequency is daily for both PEPs and Sanctions. iDenfy offers data from all local and regional sanctions lists, with an option to filter by specific country lists.
AML ongoing monitoring is implemented both in the dashboard and via API. Every day, the software tracks whether new changes occur. If so, the monitoring subject emits an alert, which is visible in the dashboard and received via webhook callback. Compliance officers can then mark hits as true or false positives with a full audit trail.
Adverse media screening. iDenfy uses its own search algorithm, indexing all relevant news sources. Options include searching by a particular language, support for typos and name fuzzy matching, company abbreviations, and fuzziness matching. An in-house algorithm understands the context of the articles and excludes them if they don’t provide up-to-date information about the subject.
Integration with identity verification. Since iDenfy has a pricing model that charges only per approved verifications, performed AML checks can save up to 75% of compliance costs. There is also a built-in risk scoring service to provide a risk score for each onboarded customer.
Company sanctions check and KYB integration. iDenfy offers Know Your Business verifications where AML company checks can be automatically performed with defined custom rules.
#2 Sumsub

4.60 Average Score · (4.7 Capterra | 4.5 G2 | No reviews on TrustRadius)
Sumsub website: www.sumsub.com
Online ID verification service to help any business from any industry collect, verify, and manage user identities throughout a customer lifecycle.
Sanctions and PEPs check. Sumsub performs sanctions and PEPs checks across global lists. The company does not publicly disclose its data update frequency or exact coverage breadth.
AML ongoing monitoring. Sumsub continuously screens customer lists with global sanctions lists. It has a workflow builder that allows users to set up custom rules for when a check needs to be performed.
Adverse media screening. Sumsub does not provide public information on how it performs adverse media screening or how its crawler works. However, when evaluating their customers’ reviews, compliance officers do not express issues with their findings.
Integration with identity verification. Due to their custom workflow builder, there is an option to set custom rules, e.g., performing AML checks only for specific countries or if they hit a particular transaction threshold.
Company sanctions check and KYB integration. Sumsub does offer business verifications, but company AML check details are not displayed on the website. Contact Sumsub directly for enterprise KYB/AML options.
#3 ComplyAdvantage

4.20 Average Score · (4.0 Capterra | 4.4 G2 | No reviews on TrustRadius)
ComplyAdvantage website: complyadvantage.com
ComplyAdvantage gives businesses the financial crime insight they need to take control. Its data and technology help customers uncover the risk of who they are doing business with using a dynamic global risk database of people and companies. It is the only provider on this list with a dedicated transaction monitoring product, making it particularly well-suited for banking and fintech customers who need both screening and behavioral monitoring in one platform.
Sanctions and PEPs check. ComplyAdvantage has a proprietary real-time risk database of global Watchlists, PEPs, and Adverse Media. They update the data every 15 minutes — the highest frequency among providers on this list.
AML ongoing monitoring. ComplyAdvantage provides ongoing monitoring with additional functionality: options to filter findings based on PEP levels, risk level, and specific sanction type.
Adverse media. Uses a proprietary real-time database continuously crawled across global news sources, with filtering and false-positive reduction options available.
AML transaction monitoring. ComplyAdvantage offers a dedicated transaction monitoring product that applies rule-based and ML-driven models to detect suspicious activity patterns in payment flows — a capability not available in the other providers on this list.
Integration with identity verification. ComplyAdvantage focuses on the AML/screening layer and typically integrates with a separate KYC platform via API for document verification.
Company sanctions check and KYB integration. Business entity screening is supported.
#4 Onfido (Entrust)

4.13 Average Score · (4.8 Capterra | 4.4 G2 | 3.0 TrustRadius | 4.3 Gartner)
Onfido website: www.onfido.com
Onfido (now Entrust) is a leading global identity verification provider with AML screening capabilities integrated into its KYC workflow via custom flows.
Sanctions and PEPs check. Supported via API with real-time sanctions data and 24-hour PEP recency.
AML ongoing monitoring. Supported and included after verification using custom flow settings.
Adverse media. No public information available on algorithm or data sources.
Integration with identity verification. Native integration via Workflow Studio — AML checks can be triggered automatically as part of the KYC flow.
Company sanctions check and KYB integration. Not currently supported.
#5 Veriff

4.15 Average Score · (4.0 Capterra | 4.3 G2 | No reviews on TrustRadius)
Veriff website: www.veriff.com
Veriff is an established KYC provider with AML screening available as part of its verification platform. Primarily identity-verification-first; AML is offered as an integrated add-on.
Sanctions and PEPs check. Supported. Frequency and list coverage not publicly disclosed.
AML ongoing monitoring. Supported via dashboard and API.
Adverse media. Supported from multiple data sources.
Integration with identity verification. Native integration — AML checks are triggered as part of the verification workflow.
Company sanctions check and KYB integration. Not currently supported.
DISCLAIMER
This information is collected from public sources and vendor websites; it is not our final verdict or opinion. The information, in some cases, could be outdated. You should contact the vendor directly to get recent information. If there is missing information, please contact the website owner.